<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NY Daily Record &#187; U.S. District Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/category/case-digests/us-district-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nydailyrecord.com</link>
	<description>Since 1908</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:19:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>WDNY — Seized Accounts: United States v. Clarkson Auto Electric Inc., et al.&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/02/06/wdny-%e2%80%94-seized-accounts-united-states-v-clarkson-auto-electric-inc-et-al/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/02/06/wdny-%e2%80%94-seized-accounts-united-states-v-clarkson-auto-electric-inc-et-al/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forfeiture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seized Accounts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/02/06/wdny-%e2%80%94-seized-accounts-united-states-v-clarkson-auto-electric-inc-et-al/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY
Seized Accounts
Forfeiture 
United States v. Clarkson Auto Electric Inc., et al.
10-CR-6111CJS
Judge Payson
Background: The defendants had been charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering and other offenses. The defendants moved the court to release seized bank accounts in order to permit the defendant to retain counsel.
Ruling: The court denied the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/02/06/wdny-%e2%80%94-seized-accounts-united-states-v-clarkson-auto-electric-inc-et-al/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Removal to Federal Court: MG Building Materials Ltd. v. Paychex Inc.&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/02/01/wdny-%e2%80%94-removal-to-federal-court-mg-building-materials-ltd-v-paychex-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/02/01/wdny-%e2%80%94-removal-to-federal-court-mg-building-materials-ltd-v-paychex-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Removal to Federal Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revival Exception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/02/01/wdny-%e2%80%94-removal-to-federal-court-mg-building-materials-ltd-v-paychex-inc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY
Removal to Federal Court
Revival Exception
MG Building Materials Ltd. v. Paychex Inc.
11-cv-6165L
Judge Larimer
Background: The action was originally commenced in a Texas state court by the plaintiffs alleging breach of contract and other claims that arose from a payroll administration contract. The defendant had not initially sought removal of the action, but moved to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/02/01/wdny-%e2%80%94-removal-to-federal-court-mg-building-materials-ltd-v-paychex-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY – False Arrest: Taylor v. Fischer, et al.&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/31/wdny-%e2%80%93-false-arrest-taylor-v-fischer-et-al/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/31/wdny-%e2%80%93-false-arrest-taylor-v-fischer-et-al/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summary judgment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/31/wdny-%e2%80%93-false-arrest-taylor-v-fischer-et-al/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY
 False Arrest
Malicious Prosecution — Summary Judgment
 Taylor v. Fischer, et al. 
11-cv-6083L
Judge Larimer
 Background: The pro se plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, sued eight employees of DOCCS. The plaintiff alleged that he was falsely imprisoned, suffered emotional distress and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/31/wdny-%e2%80%93-false-arrest-taylor-v-fischer-et-al/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Deliberate Indifference: Sheils v. Jordan, et al.&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/29/wdny-%e2%80%94-deliberate-indifference-sheils-v-jordan-et-al/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/29/wdny-%e2%80%94-deliberate-indifference-sheils-v-jordan-et-al/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deliberate Indifference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inmate Injuries & Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/29/wdny-%e2%80%94-deliberate-indifference-sheils-v-jordan-et-al/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY
Deliberate Indifference
Inmate Injuries &#38; Safety
Sheils v. Jordan, et al.
10-cv-6516L
Judge Larimer
Background: The pro se plaintiff commenced action against a number of prison officials and employees of the New York State Department of Correctional Services. Two of the defendants moved to dismiss. The plaintiff did not respond to the motion. The plaintiff alleged that the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/29/wdny-%e2%80%94-deliberate-indifference-sheils-v-jordan-et-al/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Medical Malpractice: Nelson v. Alves&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/26/wdny-%e2%80%94-medical-malpractice-nelson-v-alves/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/26/wdny-%e2%80%94-medical-malpractice-nelson-v-alves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conclusory Allegations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nelson v. Alves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/26/wdny-%e2%80%94-medical-malpractice-nelson-v-alves/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY
Medical Malpractice
Conclusory Allegations
Nelson v. Alves
11-cv-6045L
Judge Larimer
Background: The pro se plaintiff commenced an action alleging that the defendant violated his constitutional rights during his confinement at Elmira Correctional Facility.  The defendant moved for summary judgment as the allegations of medical malpractice were conclusory assertions that the defendant was not treating the plaintiff’s various [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/26/wdny-%e2%80%94-medical-malpractice-nelson-v-alves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Malicious Prosecution: Doe v, Selsky, et al.&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/26/wdny-%e2%80%94-malicious-prosecution-doe-v-selsky-et-al/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/26/wdny-%e2%80%94-malicious-prosecution-doe-v-selsky-et-al/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inmate in Custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious prosecution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/26/wdny-%e2%80%94-malicious-prosecution-doe-v-selsky-et-al/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY
 Malicious Prosecution
Inmate in Custody
Doe v, Selsky, et al.
08-cv-6199L
Judge Larimer
 Background: The pro se plaintiff commenced an action against the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision alleging that the defendants violated his constitutional rights while he was confined at the Elmira Correctional Facility. Specifically, the plaintiff alleged that the defendants [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/26/wdny-%e2%80%94-malicious-prosecution-doe-v-selsky-et-al/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Failure to Prosecute: Belfield v. D. Leonard&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/24/wdny-%e2%80%94-failure-to-prosecute-belfield-v-d-leonard/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/24/wdny-%e2%80%94-failure-to-prosecute-belfield-v-d-leonard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Failure to Prosecute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/24/wdny-%e2%80%94-failure-to-prosecute-belfield-v-d-leonard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY
Failure to Prosecute
No Communication
Belfield v. D. Leonard
10-cv-6688L
Judge Larimer
Background: The pro se plaintiff commenced an action alleging various violations of his rights while he was in the custody of the New York State Department of Corrections. The defendants moved to dismiss for failure to prosecute.
Ruling: The District Court granted the defendant’s motion. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/24/wdny-%e2%80%94-failure-to-prosecute-belfield-v-d-leonard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Injunctive Relief — Inmate Transfer: Rosales v. Wright&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/16/wdny-%e2%80%94-injunctive-relief-%e2%80%94-inmate-transfer-rosales-v-wright/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/16/wdny-%e2%80%94-injunctive-relief-%e2%80%94-inmate-transfer-rosales-v-wright/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injunctive Relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inmate Transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mootness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/16/wdny-%e2%80%94-injunctive-relief-%e2%80%94-inmate-transfer-rosales-v-wright/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY
Injunctive Relief — Inmate Transfer
Mootness
Rosales v. Wright
10-cv-6044L
Judge Larimer
Background: The plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, brought a § 1983 action against seven employees alleging numerous violations of his constitutional rights relating to a series of events at Southport Correctional Facility. The defendant sought [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/16/wdny-%e2%80%94-injunctive-relief-%e2%80%94-inmate-transfer-rosales-v-wright/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Extension of Time to Serve: Albanese v. E.D.S., an HP Company/HP Enterprises Services&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/10/wdny-%e2%80%94-extension-of-time-to-serve-albanese-v-e-d-s-an-hp-companyhp-enterprises-services/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/10/wdny-%e2%80%94-extension-of-time-to-serve-albanese-v-e-d-s-an-hp-companyhp-enterprises-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extension of Time to Serve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good Cause]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/10/wdny-%e2%80%94-extension-of-time-to-serve-albanese-v-e-d-s-an-hp-companyhp-enterprises-services/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY
Extension of  Time to Serve
Good Cause
Albanese v. E.D.S., an HP Company/HP Enterprises Services
10-cv-6283L
Judge Larimer
Background: The plaintiff, a former employee of the defendants, filed an action alleging claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. The plaintiff failed on two attempts to serve the defendants. The plaintiff then moved for an extension of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/10/wdny-%e2%80%94-extension-of-time-to-serve-albanese-v-e-d-s-an-hp-companyhp-enterprises-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Post-Release Supervision: Bloom v. Fischer, et al.&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/04/wdny-%e2%80%94-post-release-supervision-bloom-v-fischer-et-al/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/04/wdny-%e2%80%94-post-release-supervision-bloom-v-fischer-et-al/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-release supervision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statute of limitations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/04/wdny-%e2%80%94-post-release-supervision-bloom-v-fischer-et-al/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY
Post-Release Supervision
Statute of Limitations
Bloom v. Fischer, et al.
11-cv-6237L
Judge Larimer
Background: The pro se plaintiff brought an action against the New York State Department of Correctional Services alleging that the defendant violated his constitutional rights by administratively imposing a period of post-release supervision on the plaintiff following his sentence of imprisonment. The defendants moved to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/01/04/wdny-%e2%80%94-post-release-supervision-bloom-v-fischer-et-al/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

