<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NY Daily Record &#187; WDNY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/category/case-digests/us-district-court/wdny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nydailyrecord.com</link>
	<description>Since 1908</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 22:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Probable Cause: Yevstifeev v. Steve, et al.&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/05/22/wdny-probable-cause-yevstifeev-v-steve-et-al/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/05/22/wdny-probable-cause-yevstifeev-v-steve-et-al/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probable cause]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/?p=72435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY Probable Cause False Arrest — Obstruction Yevstifeev v. Steve, et al. 08-cv-6476L Judge Larimer Background: The plaintiff and his wife brought an action, pro se, against the town of Brighton Police Department and its police chief alleging that the defendants unlawfully arrested and tried the plaintiff for driving while intoxicated. Upon [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/05/22/wdny-probable-cause-yevstifeev-v-steve-et-al/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Duplicative Indictments: United States v. Love</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/05/16/wdny-duplicative-indictments-united-states-v-love/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/05/16/wdny-duplicative-indictments-united-states-v-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duplicative Indictments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/?p=72143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY Duplicative Indictments Multiple Apartments United States v. Love 10-cr-6116L Judge Payson Background: The defendant had been charged in six counts of a seven-count indictment. A grand jury returned a superseding indictment charging him with two new offenses: a second count of maintaining a premises to distribute and manufacture cocaine, and a second [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/05/16/wdny-duplicative-indictments-united-states-v-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Bankruptcy: Eastman Kodak Company v. Collins Ink Corporation</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/05/15/wdny-bankruptcy-eastman-kodak-company-v-collins-ink-corporation/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/05/15/wdny-bankruptcy-eastman-kodak-company-v-collins-ink-corporation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 22:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/?p=72081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY Bankruptcy Automatic Stay Eastman Kodak Company v. Collins Ink Corporation 11-cv-6513L Judge Payson Background: The defendant provided ink to the plaintiff for use in its commercial ink-jet printers for over a decade. After the parties’ most recent three-year agreement, the defendant unilaterally terminated the agreement. The plaintiff brought an action for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/05/15/wdny-bankruptcy-eastman-kodak-company-v-collins-ink-corporation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Civil Forfeiture: USA v. Sum of $185,336.07 seized from Citizen’s Bank Account</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/05/08/wdny-civil-forfeiture-usa-v-sum-of-185336-07-seized-from-citizens-bank-account/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/05/08/wdny-civil-forfeiture-usa-v-sum-of-185336-07-seized-from-citizens-bank-account/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 06:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Forfeiture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/?p=71597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY   Civil Forfeiture Controlled Substances Act U.S.A. v. Sum of $185,336.07 seized from Citizen’s Bank Account L7N-01967 08-cv-6287L Judge Larimer &#160; Background: The U.S. commenced an in rem forfeiture action on the grounds that the claimant the sum was furnished, or was intended to be furnished, in connection to an illegal exchange [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/05/08/wdny-civil-forfeiture-usa-v-sum-of-185336-07-seized-from-citizens-bank-account/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Fibromyalgia: Sublette v. Astrue</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/30/wdny-fibromyalgia-sublette-v-astrue/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/30/wdny-fibromyalgia-sublette-v-astrue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 05:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fibromyalgia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/?p=71131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY Fibromyalgia Disabling Impairment — Weight of Physician’s Reports Sublette v. Astrue 10-CV-6299L Judge Larimer &#160; Background: The plaintiff appealed from the determination by the commissioner of Social Security that denied her claim for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits. The administrative law judge had found that the plaintiff’s fibromyalgia [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/30/wdny-fibromyalgia-sublette-v-astrue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — New Trial: Rivers v. City of Rochester&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/26/wdny-new-trial-rivers-v-city-of-rochester/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/26/wdny-new-trial-rivers-v-city-of-rochester/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/?p=71062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY New Trial Weight of Evidence — ‘Batson’ Challenges Rivers v. City of Rochester 06-cv-6391L Judge Larimer Background: The plaintiff brought a Section 1983 action against the defendant alleging false arrest, false imprisonment and excessive force. The action arose from a forcible mental hygiene arrest involving the Rochester Police Department officers who [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/26/wdny-new-trial-rivers-v-city-of-rochester/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Due Process: Molano v. Bezio</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/25/wdny-due-process-molano-v-bezio/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/25/wdny-due-process-molano-v-bezio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/?p=70954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY Due Process Inmate Hearings — Qualified Immunity Molano v. Bezio 10-cv-6481L Judge Larimer Background: The plaintiff brought an action against the director of the Special Housing and the Inmate Discipline Program alleging that during his incarceration he was denied due process of law with regard to a disciplinary hearing. The plaintiff [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/25/wdny-due-process-molano-v-bezio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Employment and Re-employment Rights Act: Evans v. MassMutual Financial Group&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/24/wdny-employment-and-re-employment-rights-act-evans-v-massmutual-financial-group/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/24/wdny-employment-and-re-employment-rights-act-evans-v-massmutual-financial-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment and Re-employment Rights Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/?p=70872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY Employment and Re-employment Rights Act Independent Contractor Evans v. MassMutual Financial Group 09-cv-6028L Judge Larimer Background: The plaintiff, a member of the New York Army National Guard, was called to duty in Iraq. At that time he was working for the defendant, but on his return, the defendant did not reinstate him [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/24/wdny-employment-and-re-employment-rights-act-evans-v-massmutual-financial-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Domestic Transactions: Absolute Activist v. Ficeto&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/19/wdny-domestic-transactions-absolute-activist-v-ficeto/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/19/wdny-domestic-transactions-absolute-activist-v-ficeto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Transactions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/?p=70619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY Domestic Transactions Subject Matter Jurisdiction Absolute Activist v. Ficeto 11-221 Judges Newman, Winter and Katzmann Background: The plaintiffs, nine Cayman Islands hedge funds, appealed the dismissal of their complaint with prejudice. The district court dismissed the complaint, sua sponte, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as the complaint did not allege domestic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/19/wdny-domestic-transactions-absolute-activist-v-ficeto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WDNY — Value of Loss: Prendergast v. Pacific Insurance Company, Limited&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/17/wdny-value-of-loss-prendergast-v-pacific-insurance-company-limited/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/17/wdny-value-of-loss-prendergast-v-pacific-insurance-company-limited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Value of Loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/?p=70465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, WDNY Value of Loss Reliability of Appraisal — Question of Fact Prendergast v. Pacific Insurance Company, Limited 09-cv-6248P Judge Payson Background: The plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment that his sports card insurance policy issued by the defendant was in effect at the time that his collection was stolen and that he had [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/17/wdny-value-of-loss-prendergast-v-pacific-insurance-company-limited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
