<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NY Daily Record &#187; private right of action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/tag/private-right-of-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nydailyrecord.com</link>
	<description>Since 1908</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:19:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Private right of action for contempt?&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2010/04/02/private-right-of-action-for-contempt/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2010/04/02/private-right-of-action-for-contempt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 20:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal contempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private right of action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/?p=37809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court is set to decide whether individuals have a private right of action for criminal contempt, or if the charge is reserved only for the government to bring.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2010/04/02/private-right-of-action-for-contempt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor Law: Kratzert v. White Lodging Services Inc.&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2010/03/09/labor-law-kratzert-v-white-lodging-services-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2010/03/09/labor-law-kratzert-v-white-lodging-services-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private right of action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court Northern District of New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/?p=35998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York
Labor Law
Private Right of Action
Kratzert v. White Lodging Services Inc.
09-CV-597
Judge Mordue
Background: The defendant moves to dismiss a diversity action on the ground that section 206-c of the New York Labor Law does not create a private right of action. Section 206-c does not expressly authorize a private right [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2010/03/09/labor-law-kratzert-v-white-lodging-services-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

