<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NY Daily Record &#187; securities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/tag/securities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nydailyrecord.com</link>
	<description>Since 1908</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 22:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ruling ends confusion for securities attorneys&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/30/ruling-ends-confusion-for-securities-attorneys/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/30/ruling-ends-confusion-for-securities-attorneys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 05:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dolan Media Newswires</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Legal Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absolute Activist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOrrison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/?p=71125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Local securities lawyers say a Second Circuit ruling defines for the first time the meaning of “domestic transaction” under a test laid out by the U.S. Supreme Court in its landmark 2010 decision, Morrison, et al. v. National Australia Bank Ltd., et al. In Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd., et al. v. Ficeto, et [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2012/04/30/ruling-ends-confusion-for-securities-attorneys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Securities: Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 33, et al. v. CBRE Realty Fin. Inc., et al.&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/07/28/securities-sheet-metal-workers-local-no-33-et-al-v-cbre-realty-fin-inc-et-al/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/07/28/securities-sheet-metal-workers-local-no-33-et-al-v-cbre-realty-fin-inc-et-al/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[materiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misstatement or Omissions of Fact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. court of appeals for the second circuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/07/28/securities-sheet-metal-workers-local-no-33-et-al-v-cbre-realty-fin-inc-et-al/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Securities Misstatement or Omissions of Fact — Materiality Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 33 et al., v. CBRE Realty Fin. Inc., et al. 10-1535-cv Judges Jacobs, Livingston, and Rakoff Background: The plaintiffs appealed from a judgment that dismissed their putative securities class action complaint for failing to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/07/28/securities-sheet-metal-workers-local-no-33-et-al-v-cbre-realty-fin-inc-et-al/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Securities: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tee to Green Golf Parks Inc.&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/03/21/securities-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-tee-to-green-golf-parks-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/03/21/securities-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-tee-to-green-golf-parks-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western District of New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/03/21/securities-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-tee-to-green-golf-parks-inc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, Western District of New York Securities Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tee to Green Golf Parks Inc. 00-CV-478 Judge Skretny Background: The Securities and Exchange Commission has moved pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for partial summary judgment against defendants Tee To Green Golf Parks Inc., and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/03/21/securities-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-tee-to-green-golf-parks-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Securities: United States v. Paul&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/03/09/securities-united-states-v-paul/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/03/09/securities-united-states-v-paul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decline in Value of Collateral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/03/09/securities-united-states-v-paul/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Securities Restitution — Decline in Value of Collateral United States v. Paul 09-3191-cr Appealed from the Eastern District of New York Background: Defendant Peter Paul appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the district court following his guilty plea to securities fraud in violation of 15 U.S.C. §§78j(b) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/03/09/securities-united-states-v-paul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Securities: Standard Investment Chartered Inc. v. National Association of Securities Dealers&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/24/securities-standard-investment-chartered-inc-v-national-association-of-securities-dealers/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/24/securities-standard-investment-chartered-inc-v-national-association-of-securities-dealers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Regulatory Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/24/securities-standard-investment-chartered-inc-v-national-association-of-securities-dealers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Securities Self-Regulatory Organizations — Liability Standard Investment Chartered Inc. v. National Association of Securities Dealers 10-945-cv Appealed from the Southern District of New York Background: This appeal is from an order of the district court granting the appellees’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. This case arises out of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/24/securities-standard-investment-chartered-inc-v-national-association-of-securities-dealers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Securities: Landmen Partners Inc. v. The Blackstone Group LP&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/14/securities-landmen-partners-inc-v-the-blackstone-group-lp/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/14/securities-landmen-partners-inc-v-the-blackstone-group-lp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undisclosed Risks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/14/securities-landmen-partners-inc-v-the-blackstone-group-lp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Securities IPO — Undisclosed Risks Landmen Partners Inc. v. The Blackstone Group LP 09-4426-cv Appealed from the Southern District of New York Background: The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the district court dismissing plaintiffs’ putative securities class action complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 32 12(b)(6) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/14/securities-landmen-partners-inc-v-the-blackstone-group-lp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Securities: SEC v. Tee to Green Gold Parks Inc.&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/20/securities-sec-v-tee-to-green-gold-parks-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/20/securities-sec-v-tee-to-green-gold-parks-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 22:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western District of New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/20/securities-sec-v-tee-to-green-gold-parks-inc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, Western District of New York Securities SEC v. Tee to Green Gold Parks Inc. 00-CV-478 Judge Skretny Background: Presently before this court are pro se defendant Steven Blumhagen’s motion to dismiss and plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission’s motion for partial summary judgment. On May 31, 2000, the commission filed its complaint in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/20/securities-sec-v-tee-to-green-gold-parks-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Steven Rattner close to deal with SEC</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2010/10/14/report-steven-rattner-close-to-deal-with-sec/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2010/10/14/report-steven-rattner-close-to-deal-with-sec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration car czar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay-to-play]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Rattner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/?p=50159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK CITY — The Securities and Exchange Commission could vote to settle a securities case with former Obama administration car czar Steven Rattner, according to published reports on Thursday.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2010/10/14/report-steven-rattner-close-to-deal-with-sec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Securities: Iowa Public Employees’ Retirement System v. MF Global Ltd.&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2010/09/15/securities-iowa-public-employees%e2%80%99-retirement-system-v-mf-global-ltd/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2010/09/15/securities-iowa-public-employees%e2%80%99-retirement-system-v-mf-global-ltd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/?p=48466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Securities Iowa Public Employees’ Retirement System v. MF Global Ltd. 09-3919-cv Appealed from the Southern District of New York Background: The plaintiffs appeal from a July 23, 2009 judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissing their complaint for failure to state a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2010/09/15/securities-iowa-public-employees%e2%80%99-retirement-system-v-mf-global-ltd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Securities: Alliance Industries, Inc. v. Longyear Holding, Inc.&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2010/08/27/securities-alliance-industries-inc-v-longyear-holding-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2010/08/27/securities-alliance-industries-inc-v-longyear-holding-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockholders suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court Western District of New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/?p=47448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court, Western District of New York Securities Stockholders’ Suit — Legal Fees Alliance Industries, Inc. v. Longyear Holding, Inc. 08-CV-490 Judge Scott Background: This is a diversity stockholders’ suit arising from the purchase of stock in a corporation to acquire its subsidiary and subsequent disposition of funds in an escrow account created as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2010/08/27/securities-alliance-industries-inc-v-longyear-holding-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

