<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NY Daily Record &#187; U.S. Court of Appeals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/tag/us-court-of-appeals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nydailyrecord.com</link>
	<description>Since 1908</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:04:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Immigration: Wong v. Holder&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/03/immigration-wong-v-holder/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/03/immigration-wong-v-holder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Convention Against Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/03/immigration-wong-v-holder/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Immigration
Convention Against Torture
Wong v. Holder
08-5328-ag
Appealed from the Board of Immigration Appeals
Background: Chinese nationals Mei Fun Wong and her son Ling Go petition for review of an Oct. 6, 2008 decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding a March 1, 2002 order by Immigration Judge William F. Jankun, directing petitioners’ [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/03/immigration-wong-v-holder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fourth Amendment: United States v. Hassock&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/02/fourth-amendment-united-states-v-hassock/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/02/fourth-amendment-united-states-v-hassock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scope of Protective Sweep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/02/fourth-amendment-united-states-v-hassock/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Fourth Amendment
Scope of Protective Sweep
United States v. Hassock
09-5193-cr
Appealed from the Southern District of New York
Background: The government appeals from an order in the district court suppressing as evidence a handgun allegedly belonging to defendant-appellee Eric Hassock, a/k/a David St. Walton, a/k/a Basil LNU. The government proposed to enter the firearm [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/02/fourth-amendment-united-states-v-hassock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration: Oouch v. Department of Homeland Security&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/02/immigration-oouch-v-department-of-homeland-security/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/02/immigration-oouch-v-department-of-homeland-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggravated felony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/02/immigration-oouch-v-department-of-homeland-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Immigration
Removal — Aggravated Felony
Oouch v. Department of Homeland Security
09-4834-ag
Appealed from the Board of Immigration Appeals
Background: Petitioner seeks review of an Oct. 23, 2009 decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, dismissing his appeal from a decision of an immigration judge deeming him removable as an aggravated felon under 8 U.S.C. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/02/immigration-oouch-v-department-of-homeland-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>False Arrest: Caceres v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/02/false-arrest-caceres-v-the-port-authority-of-new-york-and-new-jersey/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/02/false-arrest-caceres-v-the-port-authority-of-new-york-and-new-jersey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statute of limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/02/false-arrest-caceres-v-the-port-authority-of-new-york-and-new-jersey/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
False Arrest
Statute of Limitations
Caceres v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
09-3064-cv
Appealed from the Southern District of New York
Background: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey detained plaintiff Caceres for two days on a warrant erroneously attributed to him. A jury assessed false-arrest damages at $10,000, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/02/02/false-arrest-caceres-v-the-port-authority-of-new-york-and-new-jersey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminal Jurisdiction: Carvajal v. Holder&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/criminal-jurisdiction-carvajal-v-holder/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/criminal-jurisdiction-carvajal-v-holder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Location of Offense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/criminal-jurisdiction-carvajal-v-holder/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Criminal Jurisdiction
Location of Offense
Carvajal v. Holder
09-0826-pr
Appealed from the Southern District of New York
Background: This appeal is from the denial of an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Alvaro Carvajal, a New York state prisoner, argues that his [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/criminal-jurisdiction-carvajal-v-holder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration: Galluzzo v. Holder&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/immigration-galluzzo-v-holder/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/immigration-galluzzo-v-holder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/immigration-galluzzo-v-holder/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Immigration
Hearing — Due Process
Galluzzo v. Holder
08-6036-ag
Appealed from the Southern District of New York
Background: This case presents a petition for review of an Oct. 1, 2008 removal order issued by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and appeal from an order of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/immigration-galluzzo-v-holder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insurance: 10 Ellicott Square Court Corp. v. Mountain Valley Indemnity Co.&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/insurance-10-ellicott-square-court-corp-v-mountain-valley-indemnity-co/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/insurance-10-ellicott-square-court-corp-v-mountain-valley-indemnity-co/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Execution of Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Umbrella Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/insurance-10-ellicott-square-court-corp-v-mountain-valley-indemnity-co/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Insurance
Execution of Contract — Umbrella Policy
10 Ellicott Square Court Corp. v. Mountain Valley Indemnity Co.
10-0799-cv
Appealed from the Western District of New York
Background: The defendant appealed from an award of summary judgment entered in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York in favor of plaintiffs on their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/insurance-10-ellicott-square-court-corp-v-mountain-valley-indemnity-co/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sexual Harassment: Papelino v. Albany College of Pharmacy of Union University&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/sexual-harassment-papelino-v-albany-college-of-pharmacy-of-union-university/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/sexual-harassment-papelino-v-albany-college-of-pharmacy-of-union-university/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/sexual-harassment-papelino-v-albany-college-of-pharmacy-of-union-university/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Sexual Harassment
Education
Papelino v. Albany College of Pharmacy of Union University
09-4248-cv
Appealed from the Northern District of New York
Background: This appeal is from an order that dismissed the plaintiffs-appellants’ sexual harassment and retaliation claims under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 and breach of contract and tort claims under state [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/sexual-harassment-papelino-v-albany-college-of-pharmacy-of-union-university/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright: Kwan v. Schlein&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/copyright-kwan-v-schlein/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/copyright-kwan-v-schlein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statute of limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/copyright-kwan-v-schlein/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Copyright
Statute of Limitations
Kwan v. Schlein
09-5202-cv
Appealed from the Southern District of New York
Background: This appeal is from two orders, one of which granted summary judgment on appellant’s claim for copyright infringement on the ground that the claim was time-barred. The other, entered on Nov. 23, 2009, dismissed without prejudice the appellees’ [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/28/copyright-kwan-v-schlein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bail: United States v. English&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/21/bail-united-states-v-english/</link>
		<comments>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/21/bail-united-states-v-english/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Digests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danger to community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flight Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/21/bail-united-states-v-english/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Bail
Danger to Community — Flight Risk
United States v. English
10-3258-cr
Appealed from the Southern District of New York
Background: This appeal is from an order denying defendants&#8217; motions for bail pending trial, and ordering their pretrial detention pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142 on grounds of risk of flight and danger to the community. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nydailyrecord.com/blog/2011/01/21/bail-united-states-v-english/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

