Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Child Custody: Factors

By: Daily Record Staff//December 16, 2010

Child Custody: Factors

By: Daily Record Staff//December 16, 2010//

Listen to this article

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Child Custody


CAF 09-01809
Appealed from Oneida County Family Court

Background: In a custody proceeding, the judge granted custody to the mother with visitation to the mother. On appeal, the mother contended that the judge failed to set forth its findings of fact and reasons for its determination. 

Ruling: The order is reversed and the matter remitted for further proceedings. The decision underlying the order recited in a conclusory manner that the trial judge had considered the testimony and exhibits presented. This is insufficient to comply with CPLR 4213. Findings by the trial judge that both parties were “nice people” and “good parents” do not allow an appellate court to effectively review the lower court’s determination. The appellate division declined to make its own findings of fact.

Scott T. Godkin for the petitioner; Diane M. Martin-Grande for the respondent; Mark P. Malak for the children

Case Digests

See all Case Digests

Law News

See All Law News


How Is My Site?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...