Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Law / Crime and Punishment / iPhone secrets among tips that led to arrests

iPhone secrets among tips that led to arrests

NEW YORK CITY — Secrets about Apple Inc.’s iPhone were among insider trading tips that led to the arrests Thursday of three employees at public companies and a sales executive at a California expert-networking firm, authorities said as they boosted to six the number of arrests in a wide-ranging Wall Street insider trading probe.

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara portrayed James Fleishman, 41, a networking executive who worked at Mountain View, Calif.-based Primary Global Research, as central to the scheme that led to the latest arrests. Fleishman was charged with wire fraud and conspiracy for providing confidential information to the firm’s clients, including hedge funds, the prosecutor said.

A criminal complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan said some of the tips resulted from inside information that was shared about highly confidential Apple sales forecasts information, new product features for the iPhone and a top-secret project known internally at Apple as “K48,” which became the iPad, launched this year.

Others charged were Mark Anthony Longoria, 44, of Round Rock, Texas; Walter Shimoon, 39, of San Diego; and Manosha Karunatilaka, 37, of Marlborough, Mass. They were charged with wire fraud and conspiracy to commit securities fraud and wire fraud, according to papers filed in federal court in Manhattan.

The new federal insider trading probe targets industry analysts, experts and consultants.

In a release, Bharara said the charges allege that a “corrupt network of insiders at some of the world’s leading technology companies served as so-called ‘consultants’ who sold out their employers by stealing and then peddling their valuable inside information.”

He said the allegations describe criminal conduct that went “well beyond any legitimate information-sharing or good faith business practice.”

Longoria worked at Advanced Micro Devices Inc. as a supply chain manager, Shimoon worked at Flextronics International Limited as senior director of business development and Karunatilaka worked as an account manager at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. office in Burlington, Mass.

According to the complaint, Fleishman, of Santa Clara, Calif., was responsible as a sales manager at Primary Global Research for attracting new clients and keeping existing clients happy with the service.

The complaint said Fleishman helped arrange for clients, including hedge funds, to speak with consultants that he knew could provide inside information to the clients.

The complaint said the charges against Shimoon pertained to a business relationship Flextronics had with Apple for camera and charger components for the iPhone and iPod. It said Shimoon illegally provided information that had been given to Flextronics employees about sales forecasts and new product features for Apple’s iPhone.

It said he also spoke of the iPad project, saying on secretly recorded conversations with a government cooperating witness: “At Apple you can get fired for saying K48 … outside of a meeting that doesn’t have K48 people in it. That’s how crazy they are about it.”

The complaint said Shimoon was also captured on wiretaps promising to get secrets about sales at Research In Motion Ltd., which makes Blackberrys.

Bail was set at $250,000 for Karunatilaka after an initial appearance in federal court in Boston. He was expected to be released later Thursday. His lawyer, Brad Bailey, said he was reviewing the allegations against his client and would decide how to proceed. He said it was likely Karunatilaka would appear in Manhattan court sometime in January.

Sam Bassett, a lawyer for Longoria, said his client “has been cooperating and intends to continue cooperating.”

It was not immediately clear who would represent Shimoon at an initial court appearance. Lawyers for the others did not immediately return phone calls for comment.

Shimoon has been terminated and Flextronics has clear policies prohibiting the release of confidential information about the company and its business partners, Flextronics said in a statement.

Mike Silverman, an AMD Global Communications spokesman, said Longoria resigned Oct. 22 from the company where he had worked since January 2007.

“It appears that AMD is the victim of an insider trading scheme,” Silverman said. He added that AMD was cooperating with investigators.

Silverman said the company had policies regarding work by its employees outside the company, “including consulting arrangements such as the so-called expert networks that appear to be at the heart of the government’s insider trading investigations.”

Prosecutors also announced that Daniel Devore, formerly a global supply manager for Dell Inc. who worked as a consultant for the firm, pleaded guilty Dec. 10 to wire fraud and conspiracy charges in a cooperation deal that could win him leniency at sentencing. His lawyer, John Sutton, declined to comment Thursday.

David Best, a Dell spokesman, said the company would cooperate fully with law enforcement authorities.

The charges came several weeks after a New Jersey consulting firm executive became the first to be arrested in the investigation.

The prosecution is an offshoot of a probe of Galleon Funds founder Raj Rajaratnam and 22 others in which prosecutors made extensive use of wiretaps, which are more common in drug and organized crime investigations. Rajaratnam has pleaded not guilty and said he only traded with information available to the public.

On wiretaps used to build evidence against those arrested Thursday, Fleishman and Longoria could be heard speaking about the Galleon probe, with Fleishman assuring Longoria that Galleon was not a client, according to court papers.

The complaint said Longoria responded: “OK. Good. I wasn’t sure. I was, like, really getting nervous.”

FBI Assistant Director Janice K. Fedarcyk said the more than $400,000 that the Primary Global Research paid the four consultants merely to participate in phone calls with their clients “is an indication of the value placed on the information.

“This wasn’t market research. What the defendants did was purchase and sell insider information,” Fedarcyk said, adding: “Our investigation is most assuredly continuing.”