Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Second Circuit — Contract — Default: Karmely v. Wertheimer

By: Daily Record Staff//December 18, 2013

Second Circuit — Contract — Default: Karmely v. Wertheimer

By: Daily Record Staff//December 18, 2013//

Listen to this article

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Contract — Default

Ambiguity — Contrary Clauses

Karmely v. Wertheimer
12-3781-cv
Judges Newman, Winter and Droney

Background: The appellants challenge the dismissal of their complaint challenging the foreclosure of collateral for the nonpayment of a loan. The lender issued the agreement to himself and his partner. They challenge that a default occurred permitting foreclosure.

Ruling: The Second Circuit reversed and remanded. The court found that the terms of the agreement were ambiguous. The court noted a contractual clause that prohibits a payment and then provides a turnover requirement in the event payment is made contrary to the prohibition. It was unclear if this negated of the payment prohibition.

David A. Pellegrino of Phillips Nizer for the appellants; Stephen R. DiPrima for the appellees

 

 

 

Case Digests

See all Case Digests

Law News

See All Law News

Polls

How Is My Site?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...