Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Court of Appeals – Larceny: People v. Hardy

By: Daily Record Staff//December 2, 2015

Court of Appeals – Larceny: People v. Hardy

By: Daily Record Staff//December 2, 2015

New York State Court of Appeals

Larceny

Direct Evidence of Guilt – Surveillance Video

People v. Hardy

No. 159

Judge Fahey

Background: The issue on appeal is whether a surveillance video showing the defendant rifling through and then walking off with the victim’s purse constitutes direct evidence of his guilt of larceny, despite the fact that the defendant offered an alternative explanation for his behavior.

Ruling: The Court of Appeals held that the surveillance video did constitute such evidence of the defendant’s guilt and no circumstantial evidence charge was required. Further, a particular piece of evidence is not required to be dispositive of a defendant’s guilt in order to constitute direct evidence.

Eunice C. Lee for the appellant; Jared Wolkowitz for the respondent

 

Case Digests

See all Case Digests

Law News

See All Law News

Polls

How Is My Site?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...