Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics – Former Client: Opinion 15-51

By: Daily Record Staff//December 11, 2015

Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics – Former Client: Opinion 15-51

By: Daily Record Staff//December 11, 2015//

Listen to this article

NYS Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics

Former Client

Former Law Firm – Financial Relationship

Opinion 15-51

Background: A full-time judge, on the bench for under two years, asks if disqualification is required in a case involving a current or former client of the judge’s former law firm. The judge practiced law with the firm for two decades before becoming a judge, but had minimal contact with the particular client. The firm also owes the judge undistributed capital.

Opinion: The committee concluded that a full-time judge is disqualified, subject to remittal, when a client or former client of the judge’s former law firm appears before the judge. This obligation continues until two years after the financial relationship between the judge and the former firm completely ends, including return of any distributed capital to the judge. After that period, the judge has no further obligation to the former client; the decision of whether to disclose or recuse is confined solely to the judge’s discretion after considering all relevant factors.

 

Case Digests

See all Case Digests

Law News

See All Law News

Polls

How Is My Site?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...