Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Second Circuit – Sentencing reduction: United States v. Fernandez

Daily Record Staff//August 5, 2024//

Second Circuit – Sentencing reduction: United States v. Fernandez

Daily Record Staff//August 5, 2024//

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Sentencing reduction

Extraordinary and compelling reason

United States v. Fernandez

22-3122

Judges Sack, Lohier, and Kahn

Background: The government appealed from the grant of the defendant’s motion for a sentence reduction. The court found that the defendant’s possible innocence in light of the questionable credibility of a key witness and the fact that the defendant received a far longer sentence than his co-defendants warranted a sentence reduction.

Ruling: The Second Circuit reversed. The court held that it was an abuse of discretion because potential innocence is never a permissible extraordinary and compelling reason for a reduction of a sentence and the sentencing disparity is not an extraordinary and compelling reason for a reduction.

David Ambramowicz, United States attorney, for the appellant; Benjamin Gruenstein, of Cravath, Swaine & Moore, for the appellee.

Oral argument audio

Case Digests

See all Case Digests

Law News

See All Law News

Polls

How Is My Site?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...