Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Fourth Department — Article 78: Norton v. City of Hornell

Daily Record Staff//April 3, 2014//

Fourth Department — Article 78: Norton v. City of Hornell

Daily Record Staff//April 3, 2014//

,

Timeliness — Accrual

Norton v. City of Hornell
CA 13-01523
Appealed from Supreme Court, Steuben County

Background: The petitioner commenced an article 78 proceeding seeking to compel the respondents to reinstate him to the police department with back pay because his resignation was obtained by duress. He appealed from the dismissal of his petitioner.

Ruling: The Appellate Division affirmed. The court held that his petition was untimely. The petitioner’s right to demand reinstatement to his position arose when he received a letter from the district attorney stating that he bore no civil or criminal responsibility for the acts of misconduct alleged against him. The petitioner did not demand reinstatement until six months later.

Jeffrey A. Daily of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld for the petitioner-appellant; Gerard E. O’Connor of Lippman O’Connor for the respondents-respondents

Case Digests

See all Case Digests

Law News

See All Law News

Polls

How Is My Site?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...