Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

New York State Court of Appeals – Defamation: Davis, et al. v. Boeheim, et al.

Daily Record Staff//October 29, 2014//

New York State Court of Appeals – Defamation: Davis, et al. v. Boeheim, et al.

Daily Record Staff//October 29, 2014//

Listen to this article

–  – Alleging Economic Motivation – Opinion

 

Davis, et al. v. Boeheim, et al.

No. 145

Judge Rivera

 

Background: The plaintiffs commenced an action against the defendants Syracuse University and the University’s head basketball coach for defamation based on statements made in response to the plaintiffs’ allegations of sexual molestation by one of the defendants’ long-time friend and the team’s associate coach. The defendants denied knowledge of the events described by the plaintiffs and stated that their allegations were financially motivated.

 

Ruling: The Court of Appeals reversed the Appellate Division. The court held that the challenged statements are reasonably susceptible of a defamatory connotation, and not otherwise privileged, non-actionable “pure opinion.”

 

Mariann Meier Wang for the appellants; Helen V. Cantwell for the respondents

Case Digests

See all Case Digests

Law News

See All Law News

Polls

How Is My Site?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...