Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Fourth Department – Accadia Site Contracting v. Skurka

Daily Record Staff//July 7, 2015//

Fourth Department – Accadia Site Contracting v. Skurka

Daily Record Staff//July 7, 2015//

,

Statements Sufficiency – Defamatory Connotation

Accadia Site Contracting v. Skurka
CA 14-01909
Appealed from Supreme Court, Erie County

Background: The plaintiff was awarded a road construction project by the City of Niagara Falls. It commenced a defamation action based on the statements made by the defendant city engineer assigned to oversee the project to a news reporter. The defendant accused the plaintiff of rigging a compaction test and collusion. The plaintiff appealed from the dismissal of its complaint.

Ruling: The Appellate Division reversed. The court held that the particular words allegedly uttered by the defendant were sufficient to establish a claim for defamation.

Jason G. Ulatowski of Rupp, Baase, Pfalzgraf, Cunningham & Coppola for the plaintiff-appellant; William F. Savino of Woods Oviatt Gilman for the defendant-respondent

 

Case Digests

See all Case Digests

Law News

See All Law News

Polls

How Is My Site?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...